<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open-Source Nirvana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johannesbrodwall.com/2004/11/30/open-source-nirvana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johannesbrodwall.com/2004/11/30/open-source-nirvana/</link>
	<description>Johannes Brodwall&#039;s Musings on Software Architecture and Programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:37:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johannes Brodwall</title>
		<link>http://johannesbrodwall.com/2004/11/30/open-source-nirvana/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes Brodwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 03:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/?p=64#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hi, Rod

Thanks for contributing.

I am wondering if you could provide further information or references to the IP issues you refer to. Are these organizational issues (for example: An individual contributor haven&#039;t cleared the issues with his employer)?


~Johannes
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Rod</p>
<p>Thanks for contributing.</p>
<p>I am wondering if you could provide further information or references to the IP issues you refer to. Are these organizational issues (for example: An individual contributor haven&#8217;t cleared the issues with his employer)?</p>
<p>~Johannes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Johnson</title>
		<link>http://johannesbrodwall.com/2004/11/30/open-source-nirvana/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/?p=64#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hi Johannes,

I think in general it would be better for the industry as a whole for &quot;consumers&quot; of open source to contribute more back. Yet there are many reasons that doesn&#039;t happen so much--not least of them, the IP issues. (For example, we would not want any contributions to Spring that could potentially have unclear IP issues.) I think the issue of advantaging competitors is not so significant--very often, useful contributions are quite generic, like the frameworks themselves. Clearly it would be unreasonable, for example, to expect a company that implemented one of its core business algorithms as an extension of Spring to open that up to its rivals.

But of course using the framework and reporting bugs/suggesting improvements on mailing lists/issue trackers is an important contribution in itself. It is *definitely* short-sighted to be a &quot;silent&quot; user of any project, open source or commercial: not in your interests or anyone else&#039;s.

Rgds
Rod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Johannes,</p>
<p>I think in general it would be better for the industry as a whole for &#8220;consumers&#8221; of open source to contribute more back. Yet there are many reasons that doesn&#8217;t happen so much&#8211;not least of them, the IP issues. (For example, we would not want any contributions to Spring that could potentially have unclear IP issues.) I think the issue of advantaging competitors is not so significant&#8211;very often, useful contributions are quite generic, like the frameworks themselves. Clearly it would be unreasonable, for example, to expect a company that implemented one of its core business algorithms as an extension of Spring to open that up to its rivals.</p>
<p>But of course using the framework and reporting bugs/suggesting improvements on mailing lists/issue trackers is an important contribution in itself. It is *definitely* short-sighted to be a &#8220;silent&#8221; user of any project, open source or commercial: not in your interests or anyone else&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Rgds<br />
Rod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johannes Brodwall</title>
		<link>http://johannesbrodwall.com/2004/11/30/open-source-nirvana/comment-page-1/#comment-84725</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes Brodwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/?p=64#comment-84725</guid>
		<description>Hi, Rod&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for contributing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am wondering if you could provide further information or references to the IP issues you refer to. Are these organizational issues (for example: An individual contributor haven&#039;t cleared the issues with his employer)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~Johannes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Rod</p>
<p>Thanks for contributing.</p>
<p>I am wondering if you could provide further information or references to the IP issues you refer to. Are these organizational issues (for example: An individual contributor haven&#39;t cleared the issues with his employer)?</p>
<p>~Johannes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Johnson</title>
		<link>http://johannesbrodwall.com/2004/11/30/open-source-nirvana/comment-page-1/#comment-84724</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 23:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/?p=64#comment-84724</guid>
		<description>Hi Johannes,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think in general it would be better for the industry as a whole for &quot;consumers&quot; of open source to contribute more back. Yet there are many reasons that doesn&#039;t happen so much--not least of them, the IP issues. (For example, we would not want any contributions to Spring that could potentially have unclear IP issues.) I think the issue of advantaging competitors is not so significant--very often, useful contributions are quite generic, like the frameworks themselves. Clearly it would be unreasonable, for example, to expect a company that implemented one of its core business algorithms as an extension of Spring to open that up to its rivals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But of course using the framework and reporting bugs/suggesting improvements on mailing lists/issue trackers is an important contribution in itself. It is *definitely* short-sighted to be a &quot;silent&quot; user of any project, open source or commercial: not in your interests or anyone else&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rgds&lt;br&gt;Rod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Johannes,</p>
<p>I think in general it would be better for the industry as a whole for &#8220;consumers&#8221; of open source to contribute more back. Yet there are many reasons that doesn&#39;t happen so much&#8211;not least of them, the IP issues. (For example, we would not want any contributions to Spring that could potentially have unclear IP issues.) I think the issue of advantaging competitors is not so significant&#8211;very often, useful contributions are quite generic, like the frameworks themselves. Clearly it would be unreasonable, for example, to expect a company that implemented one of its core business algorithms as an extension of Spring to open that up to its rivals.</p>
<p>But of course using the framework and reporting bugs/suggesting improvements on mailing lists/issue trackers is an important contribution in itself. It is *definitely* short-sighted to be a &#8220;silent&#8221; user of any project, open source or commercial: not in your interests or anyone else&#39;s.</p>
<p>Rgds<br />Rod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
